HCPL Centre for Audit Quality and Accreditation
International accreditation is the area of the HCPL Centre for Audit Quality and Accreditation in which we prepare Polish healthcare providers for quality and safety standards recognised beyond the national assessment system. Its first programme is the collaboration around the Joint Commission International standard: Healthcare Poland Foundation has entered into a Collaborative Agreement with Joint Commission Resources, Inc., acting through its international business division Joint Commission International. Under that Agreement the Foundation is the exclusive JCI authorized and trained provider of the JCI Services in the territory of the Republic of Poland and works jointly with JCI to provide JCI-related consulting services.
What this collaboration is. Its subject is readiness consulting for healthcare organizations preparing for JCI Accreditation, and the building of an institutional platform in Poland for accreditation readiness, quality improvement and patient safety. The Foundation’s role is preparation; JCI’s role remains accreditation.
What it is not. The Foundation is not a JCI accreditation body, certification body or survey authority, does not conduct accreditation surveys, does not participate in accreditation decisions and does not influence them. All JCI accreditation and certification activities remain the sole and exclusive authority of JCI.
The parties
Joint Commission International
JCI is the international business division of Joint Commission Resources, Inc., a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to continuously improve the safety and quality of care in the United States and in the international community through the provision of education, publications, consultation and evaluation services.
Healthcare Poland Foundation
Healthcare Poland Foundation (KRS 0001066269) is a private foundation established under the laws of the Republic of Poland, with the purpose of strengthening international quality and safety standards in healthcare, integrating stakeholders across the hospital sector, and acting as the primary institutional gateway for international accreditation and quality programmes in Poland. The Foundation operates as a supporting member of the Polish Hospital Federation (PFSz), which represents over 250 hospitals directly and approximately 500 hospitals through affiliated structures.
The Centre for Audit Quality and Accreditation
The Agreement expressly acknowledges and supports the establishment, within the Foundation, of the Centre for Audit Quality and Accreditation as the designated institutional platform for JCI-aligned quality, audit and accreditation readiness services in Poland. The Centre:
- serves as the single point of contact for JCI-related institutional readiness and consulting engagement in Poland, in collaboration with JCI;
- maintains qualified consultants trained in JCI standards and methodology;
- develops and delivers the JCI Readiness Program – Poland;
- discusses JCI standards before Polish government authorities, the Ministry of Health, the National Health Fund (NFZ), the National Centre for Quality Assessment in Health Care (CMJ) and other stakeholders — only in collaboration with JCI;
- pursues JCI recognition for qualified Foundation consultants as a medium-term objective.
The Centre is not — and under the Agreement may not hold itself out as — an accreditation body, a certification body, a survey authority, a representative for accreditation decisions, or a delegate of JCI accreditation functions.
Quality in the health system: why this matters now
In Poland, quality has ceased to be a declaratory category. The Act of 16 June 2023 on quality in healthcare and patient safety (Journal of Laws 2023, item 1692) moved it into the domain of statutory obligation and tied it to the conditions of public financing. The Act rests on several pillars: authorisation of entities providing inpatient care, a mandatory internal quality and patient safety management system, voluntary accreditation granted by the minister competent for health, medical registries, and a system for recording and analysing adverse events together with a non-judicial compensation mechanism.
Three practical consequences follow. First, quality has become a matter of management accountability rather than clinical ambition alone: the head of the organization answers for whether the system exists and operates, not for the declaration that it does. Second, the analysis of adverse events has been separated from the search for a culprit; the system works only if staff report, and staff report when reporting serves organizational learning rather than sanction. Third, the requirement of measurability means an organization must be able to demonstrate not only that a procedure exists, but that it is applied, monitored and improved.
This is where an international accreditation standard adds what no internal document can substitute. JCI standards are a body of requirements centred on the clinical process and on patient safety — from patient identification and team communication, through medication safety and infection prevention and control, to governance and leadership oversight. For a Polish hospital they provide a benchmark complementary to national accreditation conducted by CMJ: they neither replace it nor compete with it, but allow an organization to test itself against an internationally comparable measure.
For the record: accreditation within the meaning of the Polish quality act is granted by the minister competent for health. JCI accreditation is a separate, voluntary international programme; it replaces neither national accreditation nor authorisation. Preparing for one standard does not discharge obligations arising under the other.
Scope of services open to application
The Agreement authorises the Foundation to deliver the full spectrum of JCI readiness and consulting services in the Territory, including in particular:
Introductory workshops and executive briefings
Sessions for boards, supervisory bodies and owners: what the JCI standard is, the scale of organizational change involved, and what resources and timeframe are realistic.
Readiness assessment and gap analysis
JCI Readiness Assessments and Gap Analysis using JCI methodology — identifying the areas requiring change and ranking their urgency.
Implementation programmes
Implementation support in governance, infection prevention and control, medication safety, international patient safety goals and clinical communication — focused on readiness for JCI standards.
Mock surveys
Mock survey preparation and mock surveys, with a findings report and a corrective action plan.
CMJ-to-JCI transition packages
A pathway for organizations that have completed, or are undergoing, national accreditation and wish to build on that work when preparing for the international standard.
Training academies
Training programmes for hospital quality managers and for the teams responsible for the internal quality and patient safety management system.
Institutional representation
Representation of JCI standards before Polish authorities, regulators and industry bodies — conducted in collaboration with JCI.
When a service begins. Under the Agreement, an activity constitutes the delivery of JCI Services to a given organization only where that organization has entered into a written engagement contract with the Foundation for that activity. Introductory workshops, executive briefings, general market education, conference participation and unsolicited enquiries do not, of themselves, constitute the delivery of JCI Services — and create no obligation on the enquirer.
Delivery: how the work proceeds
- Enquiry and initial conversationThe organization describes its starting point and intent. We establish whether the right path is a readiness assessment, an implementation programme, or an executive briefing only at this stage.
- Scope and contractScope of work, schedule, team and cost. Delivery begins once a written engagement contract is in place.
- Readiness assessment and gap analysisDocument review, process observation, interviews with staff and leadership. The output is a findings report ranking gaps against the requirements of the standard.
- Implementation planFindings translated into the organization’s own work plan: tasks, owners, deadlines, measures. The plan belongs to the organization and remains executable without further external support.
- Implementation and capability buildingSupport for the teams in the areas covered by the plan, training and academies for quality staff, periodic progress review.
- Mock surveyA simulated survey conducted using JCI methodology, with a report and corrective action plan ahead of any application to JCI.
- Application to JCIAn organization that decides to seek accreditation applies to JCI. Application acceptance, eligibility determination, survey scheduling, survey team selection, survey conduct, the survey report and the accreditation decision belong exclusively to JCI.
Consulting services are independent from accreditation. The Foundation makes no representation regarding any effect of its services on accreditation outcomes.
Exclusivity in the Territory
The Foundation is the exclusive partner for the JCI Services in the territory of the Republic of Poland. The exclusivity covers consulting, training, readiness assessments, mock surveys, institutional representation and market development, and extends to all categories of stakeholders — hospitals and hospital systems, government entities, the payer (NFZ) and regulatory bodies. The Foundation holds this exclusivity in its own right, as the Centre for Audit Quality and Accreditation, and selects in its own discretion the organizations it prepares.
What the exclusivity covers
- consulting and readiness work for JCI standards in Poland;
- training and academies in JCI standards and methodology;
- readiness assessments, gap analyses and mock surveys;
- representation of JCI standards in domestic institutional dialogue;
- market development for the JCI Services in Poland.
What it does not cover
- JCI accreditation and certification — the sole and exclusive domain of JCI;
- interpretation of JCI standards, scoring methodology and decision rules;
- any participation in, or influence over, accreditation decisions;
- any authority to act for JCI or to commit JCI to anything.
Who may apply
| Organization | Typical entry point |
|---|---|
| Public and private hospitals, including inpatient care providers | Executive briefing or readiness assessment |
| Hospital groups and networks, owners (local government, universities) | Readiness assessment for a reference site, then a group programme |
| Organizations holding or pursuing national accreditation | CMJ-to-JCI transition package |
| Providers serving international patients and reference centres | Readiness assessment and implementation programme |
| Quality and patient safety teams | Training academy for quality managers |
| Government authorities, the payer, regulators | Institutional dialogue on JCI standards — in collaboration with JCI |
An enquiry commits you to nothing and does not require a prior decision to seek accreditation. The first conversation exists to establish whether, and which, pathway makes sense.
Person responsible
Piotr Welenc
Director, Centre for Audit Quality and Accreditation
Healthcare Poland Foundation
CISA, CGEIT, CRISC, CRMA, CDPSE, IRCA ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, IRCA ISO 22301 Lead Auditor. Member of Technical Committee KT 306 of the Polish Committee for Standardization.
phone +48 603 692 276
e-mail: p.welenc@healthcarepoland.pl
Centre: global@healthcarepoland.pl, phone +48 787 000 827
Enquiry form
The form is addressed to the Director of the Centre for Audit Quality and Accreditation, copied to the Centre’s office. We reply within two business days.
The limits we hold ourselves to
Accreditation belongs to JCI. Application acceptance, eligibility determinations, survey scheduling, survey team selection, survey conduct, survey reports, follow-up determinations, accreditation or certification decisions, issuance or denial, publication of accreditation or certification status, and interpretation of JCI policies, standards, scoring and decision rules are the sole and exclusive responsibility and authority of JCI.
The Foundation does not interpret JCI standards and does not represent that it participates in or influences any accreditation or certification decision.
The Centre does not convert the JCI standard into a programme of its own. Other than the JCI Services provided in collaboration with the Foundation, JCI remains the sole and exclusive provider of any programmes based on JCI accreditation or certification.
Consulting is independent from accreditation. No representation is made regarding any effect of these services on accreditation outcomes.
Disclaimers
“Use of JCI’s logo is not an endorsement of HCPL or its products, or a statement that its expertise or products are superior to those of other comparable companies.”
Healthcare Poland Foundation is an entity independent of Joint Commission Resources, Inc. and Joint Commission International. The relationship between the parties is that of independent contractors and does not constitute a partnership, joint venture, principal/agent relationship or distribution arrangement. The Foundation is not a distributor, agent or representative of JCI and has no authority to act on JCI’s behalf.
The Collaborative Agreement does not constitute an endorsement of the Foundation or its services by JCI, Joint Commission Resources, Inc. or Joint Commission. Neither JCI nor Joint Commission has expressed any opinion whatsoever on whether the Foundation’s services or products do or do not facilitate compliance with Joint Commission International accreditation standards.
References to JCI on this page concern solely the services provided under the Collaborative Agreement and do not extend to the Foundation’s other activities.
Accreditation within the meaning of the Act of 16 June 2023 on quality in healthcare and patient safety is granted by the minister competent for health; accreditation of conformity assessment bodies is granted by the Polish Centre for Accreditation. Healthcare Poland Foundation is neither of these institutions.